achievement gap

Overview 

The Aspen Institute’s Commission on No Child Left Behind is a bipartisan effort to identify and build support for improvements in federal education policy to ensure the Nation has effective tools to spur academic achievement and close the achievement gap.

Our Relationship 

Collaborative serves the Aspen Institute’s Commission on No Child Left Behind on issues such as commission management, publication and content development, and strategic planning on the dissemination of the Commission’s materials.

Collaborative produced the Commission's final report and outreach materials, including research, writing, editing and design. The redesigned Web site aligned with the release of the report and supported every aspect of communications around the release including media outreach, production of press materials and event logistics.

After the report’s release, Collaborative designed a post-release strategy to keep the Commission’s recommendations fresh in the field and to continue to lead the dialogue around the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act. Collaborative provided consulting and support for advocacy strategies such as coalition-building, and on-going communications strategies such as research and regular e-mail alerts.

Our Ideas 
Overview 

The Schott Foundation supports an “Opportunity to Learn” frame on educational policy, which focuses on ensuring that resources are provided for all students to have an equitable opportunity to learn and produce high achievement outcomes.

Our Relationship 

Collaborative has provided a spectrum of communications services in support of the Foundation’s efforts to create the strategy and infrastructure capable of engaging a state-based and national policy that ensure an opportunity to learn for all students. Our efforts have included the redesign of the Foundation’s Web site, which includes the creation of content management system and architecture that enables expanded grassroots advocacy and public engagement efforts. In addition, we have created federal policy recommendations, hosted Hill briefings, and conducted national and trade media to promote Lost Opportunity: A 50 State Report on the Opportunity To Learn in America.

In addition, we supported the agenda and partnership development of the Foundation’s 2009 Opportunity to Learn Summit, which included the participation of congressional, civil rights, research and philanthropic leaders, as well as a diverse group of stakeholders involved in civic engagement activities of students, practitioners and community leaders.

Our Services 
Overview 

Public Education Network (PEN) is a national association of local education funds (LEFs) and individuals working to advance public school reform in low-income communities. PEN believes an active, vocal constituency is the key to ensuring that every child, in every community, benefits from a quality public education.

Our Relationship 

Collaborative has supported PEN in a number of ways over the past 10 years, including the design and redesign of local education funds in Hartford, CT, Newark, NJ, and the District of Columbia. In addition, Collaborative has facilitated planning teams for the organization’s annual conference; designed, facilitated and documented leadership symposia, initiative convenings and conference sessions; supported partnership development with national funders; and written extensively about the impact of local engagement efforts.

Our Services 
Overview 

The NEA Foundation, through the unique strength of its partnership with educators, advances student achievement by investing in public education that will prepare each of America's children to learn and thrive in a rapidly changing world.

Our Relationship 

In addition to providing recommendations on the Foundation’s overall communications and knowledge management strategy, Collaborative supports the National Education Association Foundation primarily  through its Closing the Achievement Gaps Initiative. Since 2008, Collaborative has helped to design, facilitate and document the initiative’s annual convening that brings together school- and system-level practitioners, union leaders, and community-based leaders to work towards closing the achievement gap.

In 2009, Collaborative led the content creation and faciltiation of the advisory committee that oversaw the production of initiative’s publication that called for new and strategic roles for teachers unions in the creation and implementation of human capital management systems.

Our Services 
Overview 

United Way Worldwide is a worldwide network in 45 countries and territories, including nearly 1,300 local organizations in the U.S. It advances the common good, creating opportunities for a better life for all, by focusing on the three key building blocks of education, income and health. The United Way Worldwide movement creates long lasting community change by addressing the underlying causes of problems that prevent progress in these areas.

Our Relationship 

Collaborative has been called upon to provide trusted advice and consultation to United Way Worldwide on a wide variety of issues, including high-level executive consultation, strategic consulting, meeting facilitation, research and analysis, and production services.

Our Services 
Our Ideas 
Overview 

Urban Teacher Center (UTC) is cultivating the most effective and accountable teachers in the nation who will transform learning for America’s most underserved students. UTC significantly accelerates student achievement in the nation’s highest-need schools by recruiting outstanding teacher candidates, equipping them with state-of-art training, and linking certification directly to student performance.

Our Services 

Collaborative congratulates our client, Denver Public Schools (DPS), along with their partners, University of Colorado at Boulder (CU Boulder) and Padres y Jóvenes Unidos (Padres), for being one of 49 winners of the Investing in Innovation, or i3, grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Education in the amount of up to $25 million.

DPS, along with their partners, University of Colorado at Boulder (CU Boulder) and Padres y Jóvenes Unidos (Padres), will use these funds to deliver on Collaborative Strategic Reading Colorado (CSR-CO). The mission of CSR-CO is to improve literacy and bi-literacy instruction and achievement in schools with high numbers of ELL students, by implementing successful strategies used in linguistically diverse classrooms across content areas to address the linguistic and academic needs of English-language learners (ELLs) and students with disabilities at the middle school level.   

Collaborative Communications Group worked alongside DPS, CU Boulder and Padres until the May 12, 2010 i3 deadline and provided strategic guidance, writing, editing, facilitation and partnership management to ensure the most accurate, comprehensive and reflective proposal was submitted to the Department of Education.  

We are humbled and honored to have worked alongside these partners to help craft their strategies and application.

Learn more about Denver Public Schools i3 award.

Assessing Messaging, Strengthening Brand, Evaluating and Enhancing Communications Vehicles

The Challenge 

The National Staff Development Council (NSDC) is facing an issue that many associations are facing: how to reenergize its relevancy in a changing marketplace. NSDC has a very clear organizational mission for providing and promoting professional learning and building capacity for educators for the success of every child. But the number of people in the fields of policy, leadership and practice who know NSDC and are applying its philosophy could be far greater.

Specifically, NSDC was looking to find an organization with experience in conducting communications and publications audits for nonprofit member associations designed to increase the association's influence, reach and membership.

Our Approach 

We have worked extensively with organizations that have a shared interest in using high-quality professional learning as a lever for student performance. This opportunity to work with NSDC gave Collaborative a chance to apply its own knowledge and skills-which spans both communications as well as considerable content knowledge about professional learning and its role in improving public education systems, at the federal, state, district and school levels.

We saw this as an opportune time for NSDC to align its communications functions and capacity with the organizational mission, vision and values-not just conduct individual and isolated communications efforts. We managed a number of efforts to fully assess and evaluate NSDC's communications:

  • Stakeholder interviews: We spoke with key members, consultants, board members and NSDC staff on the specifics of quality of NSDC communications and which messages resonate the best as well as ongoing issues in the field.
  • Comprehensive Materials Review: We assessed over 60 publications and marketing collateral across a number of qualifiers.
  • Peer Analysis: We helped identify six other organizations working in professional learning and compared and contrasted key characteristics.
  • Web Review: We analyzed current and potential web site capabilities and provided clear recommendations for strengthening its online presence.
  • Strategic Direction: We created a number of tools to help guide the organization as it continues to develop and evolve its communications, and ultimately organizational, strategy, including setting a unifying communications department structure.
Our Impact 

This audit process proceeded in a manner that helped shape the overall communications strategy of the organization and set new direction for communications-as well as strategic-staff.  A concluding report helped prioritize NSDC's efforts moving forward. It shaped logical, achievable goals that could immediately be taken on by the organization that would maximize member retention and further cement NSDC mission and guiding principles in future materials and outreach activities.

From this process came a very clear definition of where the organization can focus its work, serve members better, and even where it can focus its staff capacity. Through the identification of the vast potential of specific aspects of the organization, NSDC is able to leverage itself. The organization has solutions for becoming a stronger communicator, more visible in advocacy and policymaking, and the go-to resource on professional learning.

Bringing Communities Together to Eradicate the Achievement Gap

The Challenge 

The Kettering Foundation wanted to know how local education funds (LEFs) in six American cities implemented community forums to determine how the achievement gap is defined and expressed in public education systems, and the causes and possible solutions for closing this gap. The Foundation had created tools for moderators and participants of community forums, and sought to understand how these tools in practice surfaced important themes.

By supporting forums in six cities-Washington, DC; Corpus Christi, TX; Minneapolis, MN; Bridgeport, CT; New Orleans, LA and San Francisco, CA, the Foundation sought answers to the following key questions:

  • How do people in communities rename the issue known as the academic achievement gap?
  • What is happening in the six communities as a result of the public dialogues?
  • What are the challenges associated with using public dialogue to engage communities to address the achievement gap issue?
Our Approach 

Since late 2007, there have been 25 community forums about the achievement gap in these six cities, engaging over 1,500 participants from a wide range of backgrounds, including those of Somali, Hmong, Hispanic, Korean, Native American, White, African American and Chinese descent. Educators, superintendents, principals and teachers participated in the conversations.

Collaborative attended at least two forums in each of the six participating cities and also conducted more than 20 follow-up interviews with educators, parents and students impacted by the achievement gap discussions.

Collaborative analyzed findings and compiled a report of key themes and future potential steps for the Kettering Foundation to take when seeking to engage communities in deliberations about aspirations and actions for educational quality.

Our Impact 

Collaborative's efforts helped to reveal the nuances and understandings used in different communities when it comes to deliberations on the achievement gap. We found that communities repeatedly narrowed the focus from a broad academic concept of an achievement gap to more personal and local framings.

For example, minority students in Bridgeport compared the actions of White students to their own. Administrators in Minneapolis noted that members of ethnic groups who participated in conversations expressed a concern that the White power structure did not understand or honor their stories and did not help their children reach their full potential. This resulted in conversations around how to help all children reach their full potential.

Ultimately, the Kettering Foundation received a thoughtful analysis of themes from nationwide discussions, and an understanding of how their materials worked in practice to support local dialogue that leads to change.

Using Interactive Technology to Communicate Critical Information on Access and Equity in Public Education

The Challenge 

The Schott Foundation conducted a detailed study on the state of public education in the United States, resulting in the release of the report Lost Opportunity: A 50 State Report on the Opportunity to Learn in America. The report explores disparities in quality and proficiency, as well as access and equity in public education. The Foundation wanted to take the findings from their printed report and make them available on their Web site in a user-friendly format.

Our Approach 

Our approach was to present the information in an interactive, online map of the United States. Individual states are colored along a spectrum of performance, from red (poor performance) to blue (high performance). This color-coding approach enables visitors to view comparative snapshots of state performance in public education. Users click individual states to view specific data on access, or the chance that a disadvantaged student will have access to a high performing school compared to a white, non-Latino student; proficiency, or the percentage of eight graders who scored proficient or above on the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) reading exam; and cost, or the total economic burden carried by state taxpayers because of inequity.

Our Impact 

This work supports The Schott Foundation's national Opportunity to Learn initiative. As the initiative expands and gains traction, the information found in the map will be essential to communicate the current disparities found in public education and motivate key stakeholders to drive change.